Meghan Markle lies exposed (Rebuttals included)
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey Interview structure
The Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey interview was an exercise in “concealment” and deception. Markle gave a solo interview in the first hour, joined by Harry in the second hour, with a visit to Archie’s Chick Inn the next day.
During the interview the couple revealed they were having a girl and that it would be their last child. Then the Markle “fantasy” spun its web to reveal an “unproven” claim of a ‘private’ marriage three days before the public ‘spectacle’. Markle continued by stating that she identified with Ariel in the Little Mermaid, because she found her voice.
Harry and Markle showed admiration for the Queen and denied that they ‘blind sighted’ her. They also stated that neither the Queen or the Duke of Edinburgh made any ‘racist’ comments about Archie.
Concealment occurs when a person evades the question or omits relevant details. Liars often prefer this because it can be difficult to reveal. Without evidence it can be challenging or nearly impossible to validate the truth or falsity of a person’s statement. Concealment is easier than falsification because the liar does not have to remember what was said previously, and it provides numerous built-in excuses. For example, the liar can claim ignorance or a faulty memory.Aldert Vrij
The Wedding 🤥
Mr Borton, former chief clerk at the Faculty Office, told The Sun: “I’m sorry, but Meghan is obviously confused and clearly misinformed. “They did not marry three days earlier in front of the Archbishop of Canterbury.
The Quiet, dignified POWER that is The Duchess of Cambridge
Meghan Markle never understood the dignity of silence. She could have learned from her much wiser and younger sister-in-law. But envy and jealousy is never a good mix. Markle uses her GOB for many things, but truth is not one of them. As we told you, Integrity matters not to Ms. Markle.
Markle stripped of HRH on the Royal Family website
This is the complete ‘about’ bio for Markle since 28 May 2020. The changes occurred in May 2020. Markle would not be expected to use her HRH style as a non working royal. The archives show Markle did not put in enough time to warrant the section, ‘Supporting the Queen‘ to be added to her bio. Markle is a walking contradiction, of course. She trashes the Royals and calls them “racists” but capitalises on her title for monetary gain. She should give it all back, if she hates the UK and the Royals that much. Her “truth” was all a lie.
In comparison, HRH The Duchess of Cambridge has an extensive bio, including current and past notable works and patronages. Click here to view her extended bio.
Harry and Meghan demoted on Royal Family website
The changes to the Royal Family website took place on 5th June 2021. In previous iterations, Harry and Markle were just below HRH The Duke of Cambridge. In the latest iteration, they have fallen from their 6th and 7th positions to 10th and 11th positions. This puts them below The Princess Royal, The Duke of York, The Countess of Wessex and The Earl of Wessex.
Harry and his wife had also agreed not to use their HRH, as they stepped away as ‘senior royals’. This is also reflected on the “About” bio section as of 28th May 2020. However because the Royal Family website had taken account of their travels previous to Megxit, public relations ‘content’ still addresses them as HRH.
We noticed that the Royal Family website is slow to update. It needs fine tuning to remove old information, including patronages which are no longer valid. The Queen’s Commonwealth Trust and The Royal National Theatre have yet to be removed.
The strategy behind keeping the ‘ex-royals’ on the Royal Family website is unclear. They have done nothing but whinge since leaving the UK. And they lied doing it too. So, why keep these two grifters on the website at all?
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey: “Unhinged Sociopath”
Harry and Markle have completely eroded the public’s confidence. Even previous staunch supports have now turned to the truth. This included ITV and The Guardian. Because truth will always find the light.
Now new reports have Markle labelled as an “unhinged sociopath” by her previous royal staff. This is no longer the case of being a workaholic or even a type-A personality trait. This even goes beyond 05:00 emails.
Basically, in a nutshell, Markle lacks empathy. Harry even screamed, “What Meghan wants, Meghan gets”. That’s all we have to know about this car-wreck.
As Gabrielle Bourne Media has consistently reported, one’s HISTORY is a pre-cursor to future events. The past is always a good indicator of what will unfold. And how you treat your pet is also a good indicator. No one, including main stream media, asked what happened to Bogart. She ditched the poor dog like an old rag, just like her dad.
Harry and Meghan back to blaming everyone but themselves
Meghan Markle superbly channeled Diana, Princess of Wales. She perfected the look (hair and makeup) and wore a $4700 Armani outfit (beyond the price tag of an average person). Even the body posture was spot on. It was an amazing performance. There was even a sprinkling of crocodile tears. What is lacking in the interview is any concrete evidence. Markle doesn’t provide any. It’s all conjecture. Harry came across as a dullard, often sounded out of breath and exasperated.
So what was the point of this two hour interview? It was a two hour “whinge” fest with unproven innuendos. Didn’t Harry inherit millions from his mum’s estate? Yet, he accused his dad of financially cutting him off. According to Harry, this occurred in the first quarter of 2020. They also deny that they stepped away. But only offered that they were willing to continue their duties on their terms. In other words, a “half in and half out” position, where they could travel back and forth from Canada.
A ‘Security’ Issue 🤥
Harry’s demands reeked of desperation and privilege. One such complaint was about the removal of their security. Markle claimed she wrote letters to the family begging them to reinstate the security. She wanted to keep Harry safe. So, where are the copies of these letters and why didn’t she show them to Oprah? Why should the UK government treasury, funded by taxpayers no doubt pay for security for non working royals? Harry and Meghan might think they are special, but they really aren’t.
The issue with ‘security’ is that Harry and Markle chose to step away, albeit they refute that. This is another meaningless swipe at the Royal family by two ‘grifters’ who want the public to feel sorry for them. Well, we and others won’t play this game. If you tell lies and then expect sympathy, it just won’t happen.
Harry decided to move the family to Los Angeles before the borders closed in Canada, due to Covid-19. They spent three months at Tyler Perry’s House figuring things out. They denied claims that they were just in it to get the Netflix and Spotify deals. Harry for his part claimed they were suggestions. But this is deceitful. He never revealed WHO made these suggestions. Thus the problem with the WHOLE interview. You never get a sense of the truth. It’s mostly concealment.
Princess Diana left Harry money 🤥
Harry stated that his mum left him money. He claimed that the funding helped him move his family to Los Angeles and set up a new life. Harry claimed that his mum knew what would happen. Funny statement given the FACT, she left Prince William money as well. Poor Harry and his made up fantasy! Tosh!
Royal Accounts: Harry and Meghan Received ‘Substantial Sum’ After US Move 🤥
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey: The Blame Shifter 🤥
Markle epitomises the blame shifter. She wanted to have her cake and eat it too. Harry didn’t do a good job training her for the role as a “senior royal”. She pointed to others who had more freedoms. They could do what they want, why can’t we? We believe she was alluding to ‘minor’ royals when making comparisons. But it’s comparing square pegs and round holes.
Markle failed to understand the difference in her status compared to “minor royals” like Princess Eugenie. She failed to grasp “duty” and “service” above personal wealth and independence. In addition to clothing and travel expenses, she was provided top-notch security detail. The “thankless” pair continued to swipe out at the Royal Family during this interview.
At times, Markle came across as a pissed off pregnant woman. She basically demanded to know why her son, Archie never got a Prince title. She wrapped this argument around him not being protected. Since he wasn’t a Prince, he wouldn’t get security detail. Because that was what she was told. By whom, no one knows because she never mentions any names.
King George V Letters Patent 🤥
Markle griped about “that convention” conjuring up images of King George VI or King George V who granted titles. She didn’t know which one, but knew about the convention. Interesting. We highlighted which one so Markle and her sycophants can be ‘educated’.
Perhaps, she was thinking about Letters patent. She complained how the other grandchildren got titles, so why couldn’t her son. No doubt she was thinking about the Duchess of Cambridge. Perhaps, she should have thought a bit more and look toward the Countess of Wessex and her children, a lord and a lady, not Prince and Princess.
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey: Fake Racism 🤥
Markle also denied reports that she and Harry refused the ‘Prince’ title for Archie. As an extra zinger, Markle also whipped out the race card. Because when you have no argument, you blame the WHOLE thing on racism.
In a bizarre twist, Markle told Oprah about a conversation she had with Harry about a “family member” regarding Archie’s skin colour and how dark it would be. But again, Markle provides no details about this “alleged” conversation. When Harry is brought in to confirm this, he agreed it happened, but refused to share the conversation with Oprah. However, Harry and Markle contradicted themselves. Markle said this happened when she was pregnant. Whereas Harry said it happened before their wedding. So it appears that one of them was ‘off script‘.
The cloak of secrecy shrouding the birth of the Royal baby on the orders of Meghan and Harry is completely unprecedented.Daily Mail 11-May-2019
Lady C REVEALS the NAME? And it has nothing to do with Archie’s skin colour!
Tom Bower, Revenge book
Editors Note (22-July-2022): In Tom Bower’s book, Revenge, it was claimed that The Duchess of Cornwall made reference to the unborn baby’s hair as “Ginger Afro”. The reference was made during a discussion with Prince Harry and family about his relationship with Meghan Markle. Whilst royal “sources” refuted this account, Clarence House has yet to comment.
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey – The Royal Family positive race relations
Baroness Floella Benjamin
Major Nana Kofi Twumasi-Ankrah
Harry and Markle “white bread” baby name
Fake or Real? Seeing double?
The photograph released by the Palace showed The Queen, Prince Philip, Doria and the Sussexes staring at a shawl”.Tom Bower, Revenge, 21-July-2022
You reap what you sow… 🤥
If Markle wanted her ‘grubby’ hands on the Prince title for Archie, she probably would have gotten it with time. You see, when Prince Charles ascends the throne, her son would automatically be entitled to be ‘Prince’. But now that is all in doubt because she accused Harry’s family of racism. So, they are now all tainted by her uncorroborated accusations. She doesn’t name names, but Oprah was informed it wasn’t the Queen and it wasn’t the Duke of Edinburgh. So that must leave either Prince Charles, the Duchess of Cornwall, the Duke of Cambridge or the Duchess of Cambridge.
If this becomes a ‘constitutional’ crisis and Prince Charles steps aside for Harry’s brother, then Archie would not be entitled a ‘Prince’. Even before the interview, questions were raised about Prince Charles’ suitability. Not because of racism, but because he is outspoken. You see, the Brits don’t like their royals to open up their GOB every time they have an opinion.
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey: Playing ‘dumb‘ 🤥
When the interview started, Markle made one of her fantastical claims that she never “Googled” Harry or the Royal Family. But Gabrielle Bourne Media had already debunked this claim back in 2018. We have corroborated account that confirmed, in fact Markle did Google Harry and that it wasn’t a “blind date”.
Markle also claimed her mum Doria contacted her a couple of months before the Oprah Winfrey interview to inquire whether Princess Diana also did an interview. Markle did confirm this with her mum but insisted she still didn’t know anything about the Royal Family. This claim was debunked in Andrew Morton’s book. He even claimed Diana, Princess of Wales was her role model.
Never “Googled” Harry and don’t know anything about the Royal Family
How many lies can you spot in the BBC interview? 🤥
Click here to view our in-depth analysis. Some lies were repackaged for the ‘Oprah Winfrey show’.
Markle lived and worked in Toronto for seven seasons of Suits 🤥
The Royal Family
Still very big in Canada, by all accounts, and the Queen is all over Canadian currency like maple syrup on waffles.BBC America – Anglophenia
Meghan Markle lies to Oprah Winfrey – Passport 🤥
Markle didn’t ‘give up’ anything. Written out of Suits! 🤥
Markle’s ‘net worth’ has been grossly exaggerated. The net worth is the difference between ‘assets‘ and ‘liabilities‘. We explain further in our report, Oprah Winfrey Unmasked.
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey: Fake Victim 🤥
Markle entered Princess Diana territory almost from the get go. Because she started with lies, it was difficult to look at the rest of the interview with any gravitas.
One strong claim she makes has to do with the infamous row that made ‘Kate cry’. Markle denied making the Duchess of Cambridge cry. She said it was the reverse, that Kate had made her cry. Again, Markle was very vague about details. She agrees it could be about the flower girl dresses, but can’t recollect anything else. Markle claimed she received an apology, flowers and a note. But did she ever show the note to Oprah? Most likely this did not occur since Oprah never mentioned it. Markle claimed that this was the “turning point”. She felt it was a ‘character assassination’.
Markle’s central argument was that she was not protected. She told Oprah that it was “unsurvivable”. She claimed to be suicidal during pregnancy. Markle also claimed she sought help within the “institution” and was denied it due to optics. She even went to HR thinking it was like the actors’ ‘union’. She wanted to be hospitalised. As we listen in, it draws us to a similar pathology of Princess Diana. What Markle claimed during the Oprah interview was similar to the claims made by Princess Diana.
Where’s Harry? 🤥
Markle recalled a moment when she was in tears but had to go to an event at Royal Albert Hall. She claimed crying during the event. Harry had comforted her. But our thoughts were where was Harry, really? He is one of the Founders of ‘Heads Together’ and he couldn’t get help for his wife? Markle claimed that he was too busy. But since Harry received therapy before why couldn’t Markle get the same? In addition, isn’t Markle’s mum a social worker?
Does this look like Markle was SILENCED?
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey: Harry’s Apple TV PLUG 🤥
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey: Harry’s Quibi Talks 🤥
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey: Australia Tour and Jealousy 🤥
Harry beamed with pride at how Markle shined during their Australia tour. He hinted that there was jealousy from other members of the royal family. Markle said she was on her own to learn the ropes. There was no class or training. She hinted there might have been for others (Catherine Middleton), but not for her. She had to Google the National Anthem and do research online. Well, if this was the truth, why didn’t she Google how to curtsey to the Queen? Get the picture here?
Whilst Markle said The Duchess of Cambridge is a good person and she liked her, she consistently threw shade. This included titles, training and tour. Markle was angry her son didn’t get a ‘Prince title’. She was upset that there was no training, but made it sound like Catherine received preferential treatment. Harry also stated that ‘other members’ were “jealous” of Markle’s success in Australia.
During the interview it was clear Markle took no responsibility or accountability. The only difference between Markle and The Duchess of Cambridge was that Catherine Middleton conformed and accepted her role within the royal construct and Markle didn’t want to. Markle also claimed she was not asked to take the “traditional” baby pictures outside hospital, like Catherine. But Markle wasn’t forthcoming with her birthing plans and kept it secret from the public.
Markle ‘Merched’ in Tonga?
Looks like Markle can’t stop lying. Remember Fiji? 🤥
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey: Staged PR 🤥
Markle’s distaste for the UK press is obvious. She claimed that the Palace and the press had a ‘symbiotic relationship’. And wondered who was controlling whom. She mentioned a party given by the Palace to the members of the press.
This accusation is a bit disingenuous when reports surfaced about Markle staging photo ops. The latest being the Remembrance Sunday photo shoot. Meghan Markle has a ‘symbiotic relationship’ with the media including People, Vogue and Essence. Networks including CNN, CBS and ET Canada have also drank the Markle Kool-Aid. She “staged” her speech to Immaculate Heart High graduation. She was NOT an invited guest speaker. But the ‘woke media’ including the Oprah Winfrey magazine promoted her speech as if she actually addressed the graduating class. She didn’t.
She also completely ignored her brother, Thomas Markle Jr’s pleads for help with his own media intrusion, when she and Prince Harry became engaged. Thus, Markle complains about the media, but can’t help her brother or father? So, Markle only helps herself. This was obvious when she didn’t come out to publicly defend Jessica Mulroney. But she had previously deployed Mulroney and badly used her as a ‘flying monkey’ to pressure her former agent to change her ‘truth‘ about Markle. See section: Court documents showed Markle tried to manipulate the press
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey – The grass is ‘greener’ across the pond?
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey: ‘Staged’ photos 🤥
Markle IGNORED her brother’s pleads for help with the MEDIA
My lawyer had a phone meeting with her lawyer, and he emailed me some of [Meghan’s] direct words. She said, ‘That’s distant family and I don’t know those people.’ That’s pretty harsh,” Tom tells In Touch, calling it “a slap in the face” and “below the belt.”In Touch | 20-April-2018
Court documents showed Markle tried to manipulate the press 🤥
Harry claimed he is Free but his brother and father are trapped
In a bizarre “Stockholm Syndrome” claim, Harry says that he is free. But claimed that his brother and father were trapped. He himself didn’t realise he was also trapped until he met Markle. This is when he understood ‘unconscious bias’. Harry admitted he loves his brother, but have to work out issues with this father. He claimed his father stopped taking his calls.
This could explain why Prince Charles stopped taking Harry’s calls.
Prince Charles is believed to be ‘hurt’ by Harry and Meghan’s decision to quit as senior royals because he has secretly given them millions to fund their lavish lifestyle and furnish their Windsor home in a show of ‘love’ for the couple since they married 20 months ago, it was claimed today.Daily Mail 13-Jan-20
Harry said that Markle saved him. Markle in turn claimed that Harry saved all of them. She also stated that they are not surviving, They were thriving.
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey: Harry’s bicycle lies 🤥
“The highlight for me is sticking him on the back of a bicycle in his little baby seat and take him on this bike ride which something I never was able to do when I was young“.
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey: Lies about Samantha Markle 🤥
“I don’t feel comfortable talking about people that I really don’t know. But I grew up as an only child, which everybody who grew up around me knows”. Check out the who’s who in the Meghan Markle “family tree”.
“She changed her last name back to Markle, she was in her early 50s at that time, only when I started dating Harry, so I think that says enough”.
People Magazine, one of Meghan Markle’s “mouthpieces” failed to do their due diligence. They failed to investigate Markle’s claim about her half-sister AND sibling, Samantha Markle. They continued to spread misinformation. Samantha Markle changed her name from Yvonne Marie Markle in 1997. Facts don’t lie, but obviously Meghan Markle and her “friends” do.
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey: Suicidal thoughts?
16th January 2019
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey: Conclusion
What is clear is that The Windsors believe their own story as the truth, even when it’s FULL of holes. There weren’t any shocking revelations, as many had already been leaked. We knew Harry and Markle would eventually be cut off. We were clamouring for it. It’s no surprise that Harry and Markle used the race card, as well as claims of “emotional” distress to gain sympathy and empathy. That didn’t garner anything from us.
Markle is not a stupid person. Matter in fact she is quite intelligent. But we still believe she is a mass manipulator. We are not here to convince anyone of our findings. People will believe what they believe. Our goal is to present behavioural information and corroborated data that contradicts Markle.
What’s almost vomit worthy is they are still whining about being cut off. They made a conscious choice. They chose to live in an $14M home. And they have to pay their own way, like so many other Americans. But unlike many who struggle just to put food on the table, these two mega wealthy dullards exploit for cash and ratings. Even though no cash passed hands, so they claim, the pair have achieved world class stardom. Now, please go away and play nice with the locals.
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey – Buckingham Palace Responds
Sky News host Gary Hardgrave says the media took the brief comment Prince William made refuting Meghan and Harry’s racism allegations and turned it into a “25 minute feature piece”. “It’s amazing how much time that whole comment has been fitted out for. The whole idea of where the Royal Family now sit, as far as I’m concerned they are a key institution of the west,” he said. Mr Hardgrave said the commonwealth extended to a third of the world’s population and included people of all backgrounds from a wide range of countries. “I do not for a moment believe the Royal Family is anything other than a British family that is very, very generous in their view of humankind.”
After the interview…
Why Integrity matters in the era of Race-baiting Narcissism
Suddenly, I reached a moment of total gut clarity: f**k it, I wasn’t going to apologise for disbelieving Meghan Markle, because the truth is that I don’t believe Meghan Markle.
Meghan Markle Oprah Winfrey – Investigating the truth
CNN Scrubbed this video. This is ONLY a ‘place card’ as proof it existed…
Editors Note (22-July-2022): Tom Bower in his book, Revenge, Meghan Markle’s “control of the media was critical”. Bower confirmed that in the after math of the Oprah Winfrey interview ‘debacle’, CNN scrubbed THIS video from the internet, at Markle’s “request”.